The Cabinet Office is under scrutiny for allegedly concealing information on behalf of the Royal Family after it was revealed that official documents mentioning Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor were held back from the National Archives.
Every year, a set of government papers is transferred to the archives in Kew, west London, following the 20-year rule. Among these papers was a No 10 file from 2004 and 2005 concerning royal visits. Initially, the papers shared with the media included a record of a meeting where officials discussed the travel arrangements of various royals, including the then Prince Andrew, from two decades ago.
Nevertheless, the minutes from the meeting were later removed from the file prior to public access. The Cabinet Office attributed this to an “administrative error,” stating that the papers were never meant to be disclosed. This incident highlights the routine practice of withholding files related to the royal family under the Public Records Act.
A spokesperson for the Cabinet Office stated, “All records are managed in accordance with the Public Records Act requirements. Any disclosure undergoes a thorough review process involving expert stakeholders.”
In contrast, Graham Smith, the chief executive of Republic, an anti-monarchy advocacy group, argued that there was no valid reason to withhold the documents, especially considering Andrew’s loss of royal status amidst ongoing controversies linked to convicted sex offender Jeffery Epstein.
Smith expressed, “There should be no special treatment for the royals. This exception should certainly not apply to Andrew after his royal title has been revoked. The probable motive behind this suppression is likely pressure from the Palace. The royal family tends to keep matters concerning Andrew confidential not to shield him but to safeguard themselves.”
“The royal institution is highly secretive in the UK. These documents should be released transparently to enable the public to form well-informed opinions about the royals,” Smith added.
Despite the scandals and accusations surrounding his association with Epstein, Andrew has consistently denied any misconduct and vehemently refutes all allegations against him.
The minutes, viewed by select journalists before being retracted, reportedly contained routine discussions among senior palace and Foreign Office officials regarding Andrew’s travel arrangements as a UK trade envoy, leading to his moniker “air miles Andy.” These discussions included trips to China, Russia, south-east Asia, and Spain.
Officials also deliberated on whether the Football Association would cover his attendance expenses at the Euro 2004 tournament in Portugal as a royal representative. Notably, changes in royal travel funding regulations meant that future visits as a trade envoy would be financed by the Royal Travel Office, necessitating an additional £90,000 from the UK Trade and Industry budget.
For more exclusive royal news updates, join our Royal WhatsApp group. Stay informed with the latest royal news and images by signing up for Mirror’s Royal newsletter. Make Daily Mirror your ‘Preferred Source’ on Google News for immediate access to important news.