A recent survey revealed that a majority of voters in the UK are in favor of implementing restrictions similar to those seen in Australia, prohibiting children under the age of 16 from accessing social media platforms. This move follows Australia’s decision to block young people from using various popular platforms including Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Threads, TikTok, Twitter, YouTube, Reddit, Kick, and Twitch. According to a poll conducted by Mirror, 64% of respondents support the idea of a ban for under-16s, while only 19% oppose it.
Joani Reid, a Scottish Labour MP and Chair of the Children’s Online Safety APPG, expressed concerns about the current situation, stating that the status quo is failing children. She emphasized the need for action to address the harms caused by unregulated social media, which parents are increasingly recognizing. Reid highlighted Australia’s proactive stance in prioritizing young people’s interests over tech companies and urged the UK to consider similar measures for safeguarding children’s well-being.
Calls to restrict social media access for teenagers have been growing, with advocates like Brianna Ghey’s mother pushing for smartphone bans in schools and advocating for under-16s to be restricted from using social media and networking apps. Concerns have also been raised about children being exposed to harmful content online, as highlighted by Ian Russell, whose daughter took her own life after encountering distressing material on social media.
Children’s Minister Josh MacAlister previously proposed a Private Member’s Bill that included a ban for under-16s, although the proposal was later diluted to secure government support for other aspects of the bill. Labour MP Jess Asato supported MacAlister’s efforts, emphasizing the various risks associated with children’s unrestricted access to social media, including mental health issues, exposure to violent content, and physical health impacts.
Despite some opposition, including from Labour leader Keir Starmer, who has expressed reservations about a ban, there is growing momentum for such measures. The UK could potentially fall behind other countries like Australia and Malaysia, which are considering similar restrictions, if it does not take decisive action. Advocates argue that a ban on social media for under-16s is essential for protecting children, setting boundaries, and allowing them to develop without the pressures of constant online exposure.
While some organizations like the NSPCC acknowledge the benefits of social media for young people, they caution against blanket bans, highlighting the importance of balancing protection with teenagers’ rights and online safety. The Government remains cautious about implementing a blanket ban but is closely monitoring international developments, particularly in Australia, to inform its approach. The Online Safety Act, which mandates protections for under-18s from harmful online content, is seen as a step in the right direction to ensure a safe digital environment for children.
A recent survey conducted by Deltapoll among 1,997 British adults revealed the public sentiment regarding social media bans for children. The data, collected in December 2025 and weighted to represent the British adult population, indicate a significant level of support for measures aimed at safeguarding children’s online experiences.